<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Another Wine Blog - Latest Comments in Wine Wankers</title><link>http://anotherwineblog.disqus.com/</link><description>A discussion of wine, beer, food and stuff.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:33:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wine Wankers</title><link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/60#comment-1228261</link><description>Good point on the ranking system. It can be a helpful tool, but if it becomes the be-all and end-all of how wine is judged then it becomes a joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Power</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wine Wankers</title><link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/60#comment-1228260</link><description>Yes I have done tastings with thousands of people now and I feel it very certain that there are many different tastes out there I try not to over describe wines in my articles because I see how much taste varies between one persona and another.  I also try not to say what I like for it has little to do with my clients, I try to figure out what they like and get them more of that!  this is why I think wine experts are silly so what if so and so rates a wine 90 do you like it?  Taste it and also these days if a wine is not 90 then many dismiss it as not good, there are just not that many 90+ wines out there there is little room at the top, what if age improves it so where to we go from there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way I do not drink when I tour people they do I just observe so I can do it day after day!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark V Marino</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>